Neighborhood House Church Planting

 

© Paul L. Hudson, Jr. 2003

 

This book was written with an Indonesian audience in mind.  The word 'pendeta' means clergyman.

 

 

 

 

Chapter 1

Traditions:  Good, Bad, Neutral, and Apostolic

In the United States, one meal that some families enjoy is a big ham.  A ham is a piece of pork, smoked, and cooked in the oven. 

 

One day an American woman was cooking a ham, and her daughter was helping her prepare the meal.  The mother cut an end off the ham, put the ham in the pan, put the end of the ham on top of the ham, and put it all in the oven. 

 

The daughter asked her mother, “Why do you cut the end off the ham before you cooked it?”

 

Here mother thought about it.  “I don’t know,” her mother replied, “My mother always cut the end of the ham and I just cook it the way she taught me.  I’ll have to remember to ask Grandma about that some time.”

 

One day, while visiting with Grandma, she asked, “Why do you always cut the end off the ham when you cook it?  Does it cook faster?”

 

“No,” Grandma said, “Our pan was too small, so I cut the ends off the ham to make it fit.”

 

The Influence of Tradition on Church Styles

Many church traditions are just like this illustration.  So many things we do in church we do because of  what we have seen and heard in our church experience, and not because of what we read in scripture. 

 

Go into a Charismatic church in Indonesia.  You may see electric guitars and keyboards.  You may hear a style of worship music that comes from America.  The preacher may be wearing a tie.  Is there anything in the Bible that teaches us that we must use electric guitars and keyboards in our meetings, or that a preacher must wear a tie?  The apostles lived before the tie was in style.  There is nothing in scripture that tells us that we must sing all our songs in a particular style of American praise music.  But some people in these churches associate this style of music with a proper church meeting.

 

Go into a Protestan church and look around.  In some churches, you will see a high pulpit on the left, nice wooden pews, a piano, and an organ.  Listen to the music in a Protestan church.  You will hear old hymns written in musical styles that were popular in northern Europe several hundred years ago.  Nothing in scripture commands us to have a raised pulpit on the left, wooden pews.  Nothing in scripture teaches us that our church music must sound like northern European music from several hundred years ago.  Yet some people feel that a church is in error if it does not sing this style of music.

 

 [footnote] The Open Church by James Rutz says that, during the Reformation John Calvin wore regular business clothes when he preached in church meetings.  The fancy, religious ceremonial clothes now worn by some Protestan clergymen are the clothes that regular businessmen would have worn in Geneva four hundred years ago!

 

Special clothing for church leaders has actually been a point of controversy since the Reformation.  Many feel that it is appropriate for ministers to dress like regular people in accordance with the priesthood of all believers.  If John Calvin dressed in regular business clothes for church, it is ironic that the regular clothes he once were are now associated with being a member of a holy pendeta class. 

 

According to an Irian Jayan church planter, some mountain tribesmen who live in very remote areas have an interesting tradition in their churches.  Some of the men still wear a koteka, though some may have a pair of shorts.  In church meetings in some of these villages, the men will attend wearing nothing but a koteka-- but not the preacher.  He will wear a tie- no shirt, no pants- a tie and a koteka or a pair of shorts.  Why does he wear a tie?  Because he is a preacher?  Wearing a tie during a meeting is a common practice for some western preachers, but it isn’t something the Bible teaches us that we must do.

 

Many of these practices, such as wearing ties or singing European-style hymns are not wrong.  It is just strange that we, as humans, have a tendency to consider non-essential traditions to be sacred.  Many of these traditions evolve over time.  Unfortunately, some of these traditions can actually hinder the spread of the Gospel.

 

Church Planting and Cultural Imperialism

Sundar Singh was born a well-to-do Indian Sikh.  His mother hoped that he would become a sadhu, a religious holy man who traveled from place to place.  After his mother died, as a teenager, Sundar Singh led a band of boys who threw rocks and Christians.  He hated Christianity.  On the verge of suicide, he prayed to God to reveal himself and had a revelation of Christ.  In his teen years, Sundar Singh became a radical Christian.  While still young, he began to travel from place to place as a Christian sadhu, evangelizing Indians.  He spent his life evangelizing in India and Tibet and even traveled to Europe.

 

Sundar Singh wore Indian clothes, ate like an Indian, talked like an Indian, and acted like an Indian.  This method of evangelism was quite revolutionary.  Some call Sundar Singh the apostle to India.  Why was this so revolutionary?  It was common for Christians in India to forsake local customs and act like the English.  The Christians wore different clothes, at with different eating utensils and adapted other practices of English culture.  The English wanted a class of educated Indians who could speak the local languages, speak English, and adapt English culture.  As a youth, Sundar Singh saw Christians as a tool of the British Empire, and associated them with a regime that colonized his country.

 

What do English-style clothing, English cooking utensils have to do with Christianity?  The earliest believers had none of these things.  The Jerusalem saints probably sung their music on a different musical scale from the European scale used in so many church hymns.

 

Let us consider Paul’s philosophy of ministry in regard to evangelizing people of different cultures:

 

1 Corinthians 9:19-22

19  For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.

20  And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;

21  To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.

22  To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.

 

If a preacher every had a good reason to impose his culture on others, wasn’t it Paul?  Paul was Jewish.  He was from a nation that God revealed Himself to and through.  God gave Israel laws and customs.  Jesus was Jewish. But God realized that God had created the Gentiles and put them in their nations, and tried to relate to them according their own culture. 

 

There were some things from Jewish culture which were important and carried over into the practices of the Gentile churches.  Jews would greet one another with a kiss, and the Gentile Christians were to practice the holy kiss.  The Lord’s Supper, practiced by all the churches, had roots in the Passover feast. 

 

Let us consider the issue of church music.  Gentile churches developed hymns. Think of the old hymn Oh Come Let Us Adore. [semba dan puji dia]  This Latin hymn is believed to date back to the 300’s.  No doubt these hymns sounded quite different from the hymns sung by the Jews in the temple.  The earliest Jerusalem saints would have sung the Psalms on a Jewish music scale.  The notes the Jews sang were probably different from the Latin hymns.  We can recognize that both this Latin hymn, and the inspired hymns of the Israelite temple as beautiful, godly music. 

 

If the early Christians were not completely adapt Jewish culture—clothing, musical styles, and various other customs, should a modern Gentile Christian group expect new believers from other cultures to accept their culture?

 

Let us suppose that a missionary reaches a very remote village in Bali.  These villagers have never even heard any kind of popular music.  Their concept of music is based the tunes played on the gamelon.  Would it be better for a missionary to teach hymns written in the musical scale of this village, or to introduce completely foreign-sounding hymns on a musical scale the villagers do not understand?  If the missionary that reaches them is from a Christian village in Irian Jaya, should he teach all the Balinese to wear koteka like his fellow Christians back home, rather than the type of clothes the Balinese like to wear?  (I know an Irian brother who plants churches in Bali, and he does not teach people to wear a koteka to the meetings.)

 

Sometimes the foreign culture missionaries introduce into new native churches can make the Gospel seem unnecessarily foreign to unbelievers in that area.  Missionaries need to be careful not to compromise to pagan customs, preserve essential Christian traditions, but also keep from evangelizing people with their own culture, rather than the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

The early churches we see in the Bible met in homes.  Yet some people seem to think that pews, pulpits, and church buildings are essentials to plant a new church.  The apostles did not wear neckties, white collars, or purple robes, yet some think that preachers must wear special clothes.  The apostles had no organs or electric guitars.  Yet some feel uncomfortable without one of these instruments in their meetings.  Let us truly consider what is Biblical Christianity, and what are aspects of our own culture associated with religion.

 

European hymns and American worship choruses are beautiful.  Western styles of music are now a part of mainstream Indonesian culture except in the remotest areas.  There is nothing wrong with a little bit of cross-cultural experience in church.  Americans sometimes like to sound Russian sounding hymns.  But we err when we begin to think that Christianity has to be wrapped in western garb in order to be legitimate.  To this day, there are people who think that a church is not singing properly if it sings worship choruses rather than the old hymns.  Is this because the Bible teaches us to sing old European hymns?  No.  Those who believe this way usually believe it because they sung hymns in their own church experience.  It is what is familiar to them, and what ‘feels right.’ 

 

A lot of what we do in church we do because we are imitating what we have seen and heard, not because of what the scriptures teach.  These are traditions that we hold to.  Some of these traditions can be good, some can be bad, and others are neutral.

 

Churches Must Be Reproducible

George Patterson is an American missionary who planted churches in Central America.  The churches he planted grew into a house church movement.  This brother has since served as a church planting coach for YWAM and other organizations, coaching teams of missionaries who have started churches in under-evangelized areas like Cuba and Mongolia.

 

One principle that George Patterson stresses is that new churches that are planted have to be reproducible.  For example, if a missionary goes into the jungle and uses an overhead projector to teach discipleship lessons to new believers using colorful overheads, this is not a reproducible pattern.  Some of those young believers may eventually turn into teachers.  The way these believers know how to teach discipleship methods is with color slides.  If they have had no experience even hearing a lesson presented another way, the model they have learned is not reproducible. 

 

Later, when the missionary has gone on to another work, and this jungle church wants to plant a church among their fellow tribesmen 

 

Imagine a missionary from Jakarta plants a church in a remote,  unreached Dayak village in central Kalimantan.  He teaches the people through an interpreter.  This Jakartan instructs the Dayak to build a church building with a steeple on top.  The villagers are not very skilled in making pews, so he returns to Jakarta, and raises some funds to buy nice wooden pews.  He also buys a spiral staircase with a pulpit on top.  He ships these items to the new Dayak church.

 

These Dayak believers now associate pews and raised pulpits with church.  Obviously, they are important, they reason, or else the missionary would not have bought them.  Later, when the missionary has gone on to another field, this Dayak church decides to reach out to other Dayak in other villages.  Each time a new church is planted in a village, special care is made to either construct nice polished pews and raised pulpits, or else to raise money to buy them from another island.  The process for completing the pulpit and pews may take nearly a year. 

 

Slowly, one year at a time, one village is reached and one church building complete with pews and pulpit is assembled.

 

Just imagine the difference if a missionary from Jakarta were to reach this Dayak village, and simply instructed them to meet in homes or in a clearing in the center of a village.  When the believers Dayak village later started their church planting campaign in other villages, they could focus on preaching and teaching, and leave new village churches with the simple, Biblical, reproducible pattern of meeting in homes.

 

One missions magazine reported on the missions efforts in Mongolia.  Many Korean missionaries had gone to Mongolia, and, due to similarities in language, were able to learn Mongolian and were able to preach in a year.  The missionaries from Korea are a great blessing to Mongolia.  However, one Korean missionary brought with him a gold communion chalice from their church in Seoul.  Imagine how slowly Mongolian churches would reproduce if new Mongolian church members got the idea that communion should always be served in a gold chalice? 

 

Following Apostolic Traditions 

To many evangelicals, ‘tradition’ is almost a bad word.  Many think of tradition as the enemy of scripture.  But the Bible tells us about certain kinds of tradition that are actually good.  Read the verse that follows carefully.

 

2 Thessalonians 2:15  Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

 

Not only are we to follow the doctrinal teachings of the New Testament, but we are also to follow the traditions of the apostles.  By studying the New Testament, we can learn the way the apostles did things, and imitate them. 

 

Paul realized that people imitate what they see.  Just think about a little child.  A little boy learns to talk like his father.  He may walk like his father walks, use his father’s gestures, and repeat the phrases his father says.  If his father says dirty words, you can expect that the child will imitate him.

 

Paul, as an apostle, had to live a clean life—a life worthy of imitation.  He also had to demonstrate the proper traditions to the churches to imitate.  Paul wrote,  “Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.  Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.  ( 1 Corinthians 11:1-2.)

 

Paul wanted believers to imitate him, and also to imitate the traditions concerning church meetings he passed down to them.  Look at the arguments Paul made to persuade the Corinthians to follow his instructions for church meetings given in I Corinthians 14.

 

1 Corinthians 14:36-37

36  What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only?

37  If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.

 

Look at verse 36.  Paul tries to persuade the Corinthians to obey his instructions based on the fact that the word of God did not originate with them and they were not the only people to have received it.  The word of God had come out from Jerusalem, and there were certain church protocols that were to be followed in all the churches.  In verse 33, Paul makes mention of ‘all the churches of the saints.’  (v. 33.)  The Corinthians did not have the right to ignore God-ordained principles for church meetings.

 

In verse 37, Paul offers an even stronger argument for following his instructions.  They were commandments of the Lord.

 

What kind of practices do we see the apostles and the early church carrying out when we look in the scriptures?  The Jerusalem church met at the temple.  The temple was the center of Jewish sacrifice.  There was one temple for the Hebrews in Jerusalem.  Rival temples in the Old Testament would have been classified as ‘high places.’  The Jerusalem church met on Solomon’s porch in the temple compound.  They also met from house to house. 

 

Acts 2:46  “And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,”

 

After the Gospel was preached among the Gentiles, who lived far from the Jerusalem temple, we see that Gentile Christians gathered in churches that met in homes.  (Romans 16:4-5, 23, I Corinthians 16:19, Colossians 4:15, and Philemon 1:2.)  There is no record of any believers building a special-purpose church building in scripture. 

 

This principle of apostolic tradition is one reason many people in house churches choose to carefully study the patterns of scripture, and implement them.  We all realize that there were some things practiced by the apostles that were only for a certain time or only for people of a certain area.  One example would be participating in temple rituals.  Paul was arrested while preparing to participate in a  temple ritual.  Yet we know from the teaching of scripture that this is not required for Gentile Christians.

 

In some areas, Christians will disagree on what is a required apostolic pattern.  One passage in scripture shows believers meeting on the first day of the week.  (Acts 20:7.)  Another verse instructions Christians to save their money for a particular offering on the first day of the week.  (I Corinthians 16:2.)  Some Christians adamantly argue, based on this, that Christians must meet and eat Holy Communion on the first day of the week, even though Acts 2:46 shows the Jerusalem church meeting and breaking bread daily.

 

We as believers must be tolerant of one another, and be sensitive to other believer’s consciences.  It is possible for some to go to far with reading apostolic traditions into scripture.  On the other hand, much of the church pays little attention to many Biblical patterns and traditions.

 

In regard to church planting, there are many Biblical patterns that can be applied to modern evangelistic efforts.   From the first century to the fourth century, Christians, though persecuted at times, grew rapidly until the pagan Roman Empire fell.  What were some of the secrets of their church growth?  What methods of church planting do we see in the New Testament?

© Paul L. Hudson, Jr. 2001


 

Chapter 2

How Paul Planted Churches

 

We use the Bible as a source for doctrine and subject matter for preaching and teaching.  But so many times, we overlook the fact that the Bible contains examples of church practices for us to imitate. 

 

Many of the modern strategies for church planting are different from the strategies we see in the book of Acts.  Let’s consider a modern church planting strategy for reaching unreached areas:  Send Indonesian young people who want to be preachers to Bible school.  When they graduate, send them one by one or two by two to a village that does not have a church.  During this time a church or yayasan contributes money to support the church planters.  After a church planter has started a new church and the number of people has grown, the church then goes about raising funds to rent, buy, or build a new church building.  The church planter stays at the church he has planted, serving as pastor.  If he chooses to leave and plant more churches, or to return to the city and minister there, another Bible college graduate may be selected to take his place as pastor. 

 

No doubt many new churches have been planted by this strategy.  But how does this strategy compare with what we see in the scriptures?  The strategies for planting churches found in the book of Acts are actually more efficient than this.  Let us study the method of church planting used by Paul and Barnabas on what is known as their First Missionary Journey, recorded in the book of Acts.

 

The Background of Paul and Barnabas

Who were Paul and Barnabas?

 

Before Saul of Tarsus (also known as Paul) was a believer, as a young man, he was a persecutor of Christians.  He had been trained in Jewish religious law by the famous Jewish scholar Gamaliel in Jerusalem.  Saul was a Pharisee, and a Roman citizen, and probably one of the more privileged Jews of his day. 

 

Saul was very zealous in his religion, and sought to persecute the church. He held the garments for those who stoned Stephen, consented to the death of other Christians who were prosecuted for their faith.  Saul went around dragging Christians out of houses, to put them in prison.  He got letters from the chief priests authorizing the arrest of Christians in Damascus.  Together with a group of Jewish men, he set out on the road to Damascus.  He then saw a light from heaven.  Christ spoke to him, and he was blind.  Then the Lord spoke to a believer in Damascus, Ananias, instructing him to baptize Saul.  Saul then became a preacher of the Gospel, and came to be know as Paul.  

 

Barnabas was a Levite from Cyprus in the Jerusalem church.  His name was Joses, but the apostles called him ‘Barnabas.’  One might translate Barnabas as ‘son of prophecy.’  Luke explains that this name meant ‘son of encouragement.’  Barnabas was the one to introduce Saul of Tarsus (also known as Paul) to the apostles in Jerusalem.

 

When scattered believers went to Antioch and started a church, the Jerusalem church sent Barnabas to encourage them.  Through Barnabas ministry, many came to the Lord.  Barnabas then went to Tarsus, found Paul, and brought him to Antioch.  Together, they taught the saints for two years.  (Acts 11:19-26.) 

 

Paul and Barnabas’ God-Approved Church Planting Methodology

Saul and Barnabas were sent out by the Spirit from Antioch.  After this, they both were involved in itinerant church planting ministries.  Let us look at the passage that tells how they were sent out.

 

Acts 13:1-4

1  Now there were in the church that was at Antioch certain prophets and teachers; as Barnabas, and Simeon that was called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen, which had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul.

 

3  And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away.

4  So they, being sent forth by the Holy Ghost, departed unto Seleucia; and from thence they sailed to Cyprus.

 

Something important to notice in this passage is that the Holy Spirit sent the apostles off on their journey to complete the work that He, the Spirit, had called them to do.  The brethren only separated them to ministry by the laying on of hands.  After this, the book of Acts refers to both men as ‘apostles’ (Acts 14:4, 14.)

 

Did Paul and Barnabas complete the work the Spirit gave them?  Let us look at the following verse about Paul and Barnabas at the completion of their journey.

 

Acts 14:26  And thence sailed to Antioch, from whence they had been recommended to the grace of God for the work which they fulfilled.

 

Here we see that Paul and Barnabas had fulfilled the work they were sent to complete.  Who had designed for them the work to do?  The Spirit.

 

Christians may debate whether people in the stories in the Bible did what was right or not.  Some may say that David was wrong to fight with the Philistines.  Some Christians think it was right for Paul to go to Jerusalem before his arrest.  Others think he was wrong.  But concerning Paul and Barnabas’ work here in Acts 13 through 14, we know that they did the work the Spirit gave them to do.  Their methodology was God-approved.  We know this because the Spirit had called them to a work and they completed that work  (Acts 13:2, 14:26).

 

In these chapters, we see a God-ordained strategy for missions.  Let us carefully examine these chapters to learn how these apostles planted churches.

 

An Overview of the First Missionary Journey

Saul and Barnabas set off with John Mark, Barnabas’ nephew, They traveled to Seleucia, and from there traveled to Cyprus, an island in the Mediterranean.  In Cyprus, we are not sure how many cities Paul and Barnabas preached in.  Acts chapter 13 does mention two cities where they ministered:  Salamis and Paphos.  Acts 13:6 mentions that Paul and Barnabas had ‘gone through the isle.”  We do not know how many churches were started through the preaching of Paul and Barnabas.  We do know that later, Barnabas returned to Cyprus when Paul suggested to him that they go visit the brethren in every city where they had preached the word of the Lord.  (Acts 15:36.)

 

From Paphos, Paul and Barnabas sailed back to the mainland, to Asia Minor.  There, Mark left them and returned home.  Paul and Barnabas traveled from city to city.  They would go into a synagogue, preach about Jesus, trying to win Jews, proselytes, and God-fearing Gentiles to the faith. 

 

We know from Acts 13 and 14 that many churches were started through Paul and Barnabas’ ministry on the mainland in Asia.  We see that people repented and believed in  Pisidian Antioch, Iconium, Lystra and Derbe.  Then Paul and Barnabas returned back through areas where they had ministered, they returned to Lystra, Iconium and Antioch.  There they encouraged the saints and ordained elders in every church.  (Acts 14:22-23.)

 

After this, Paul and Barnabas traveled to Perga, preached the word there, went to Attalia, and from there sailed back to Antioch.  In Antioch, they reported the good things that God had done on their mission.  (Acts 14:27.)

 

This journey is known as ‘The First Missionary Journey’ because it is the first of three journeys Paul took that are recorded in the book of Acts.  It is estimated that this journey may have taken less than two years.[1]

 

Paul and Barnabas’ strategy on the journey was to preach to the Jews, proselytes, and believing Gentiles in the synagogues in the cities they visited.  Usually, some people from the synagogue would believe the Gospel.  They would preach the Gospel to the Jews first, before turning to the Gentiles, and therefore preached in the synagogues first.  (Acts 13:46-49.)  Sometimes Jews who did not believe their message would stir up opposition to them, and Paul and Barnabas would flee in the midst of persecution and find another place to preach. 

 

Principles from the First Missionary Journey

Since the missionary strategy that Paul and Barnabas followed in Acts 13 through 14 is endorsed by God, we would benefit from studying it in depth.  Let us consider some key principles from the first missionary journey.

 

1.        Paul and Barnabas were sent out by the Holy Spirit.

2.        The apostles sent out planted many churches in a relatively short period of time.

3.        Paul and Barnabas left churches behind, entrusting them to the Holy Spirit, instead of remaining at a few churches pastoring them for decades.

4.        The apostles visited churches started through their ministry to strengthen them and to check up on them.

5.        The churches planted by apostles were already ‘churches’ before elders were appointed in them.

1.        The apostles appointed elders from within the churches started through their ministries.

2.        .The apostles were commended to the grace of God by the Antioch brethren, not controlled by them.

 

Sent Out by the Holy Spirit

As believers in Christ interested in evangelizing Indonesia, we need to know the Holy Spirit’s plans for evangelization.  That is why it is important to study his methods as revealed in Acts 13 through 14.  But if we simply look at what Paul and Barnabas did, and try to repeat it using our own wisdom, we will still fall short of the example they left.

 

Paul and Barnabas were chosen specifically by the Holy Spirit for the mission they chose.  The brethren in Antioch didn’t simply find a pattern of how the Spirit worked, and send out missionaries on their own.  The Spirit had already called Saul and Barnabas to a work (Acts 13:2).  The Spirit spoke to the prophets and teachers there, revealing this to them?

 

How did the Spirit speak to the church, to reveal His will regarding whom to send?  We are not completely sure from the text.  Prophets were present.  It is conceivable that the Spirit spoke through prophets.  Compare this to Timothy’s experience in recorded I Timothy 4:14. 

 

Saul and Barnabas were already faithfully serving the brethren in Antioch.  Then, God revealed to certain brethren the call that was on these men’s lives.  These brethren laid hands on Saul and Barnabas and supported them by sending them out with prayer and fasting. 

 

Something to notice about Saul and Barnabas is that the Spirit had called them to go out.  They weren’t sent on a mission because they had completed Bible college and were looking for a job.  They didn’t go out just because the church members thought it might be a good idea.  The Lord directed the church.

 

What would happen if the Spirit spoke to your church about people among you who were called to go out, preach, and plant churches?  How would your church respond?  Would you support them with prayer and fasting. 

 

Yayasan, Bible colleges and denominations sometimes send out preachers.  But how often does a local church send out preachers to preach the Gospel?  It does happen in Indonesia, but many local churches think it is the responsibility of evangelistic yayasan, Bible colleges, and denominations to send out such workers.  Never in the Bible to we see workers being sent out by these three kinds of institutions.  But we do see them being sent out by brethren that knew them from their own church.  What if God is preparing men in your church to send out people from your church to go plant churches?  Will your church be attentive to the Spirit and ready to hear His voice?  Will your church commend such men to the Lord, and pray for them, or does your church expect only Bible colleges and yayasan to send out missionaries?

 

We need to pray for the Lord to send forth laborers into his harvest, as Jesus taught (Matthew 9:38.)  We need to pray in faith, expecting God to prepare people from our churches to go preach the Gospel in the unreached areas,

 

Planting Many Churches in a  Short Period of Time

Imagine the criticism that Paul and Barnabas might receive from modern church leaders.

 

“Paul and Barnabas, how could you leave those churches alone.  You should have stayed there and pastored at the first church you started.  How could you leave those churches so quickly?”

 

Paul and Barnabas’ method of leaving behind young churches and going off to start new ones resulted in many churches.  We don’t know exactly how many cities Paul and Barnabas planted churches in on their journey together, but we do know that they preached in at least 7 cities.